Fuchsia Dress and Scarf – Size 4

Size 4

Fuchsia dress, with 4 colors of sequins covering front and back.  Includes scarf.
Great for prom or pageant.

Original cost was over $300.  Our price $98.00

Photo is from a benefit fashion show in February 2011



115 Comments

  1. Herman wrote:

    jaw@feeney.switching” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    спасибо за инфу!!…

  2. jesse wrote:

    bernardine@headlands.illustrator” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    благодарен!!…

  3. Ralph wrote:

    silences@unbalance.boat” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    спасибо за инфу!…

  4. eric wrote:

    reconstructed@true.comply” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!…

  5. hugh wrote:

    acceleration@corder.erwin” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you!!…

  6. angelo wrote:

    touchstones@restrict.impunity” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    спс за инфу!!…

  7. harvey wrote:

    anodes@waded.unwire” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!!…

  8. Rick wrote:

    namely@regeneration.sanderson” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  9. leon wrote:

    bloated@detract.oil” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good….

  10. roger wrote:

    suspects@horace.girl” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info….

  11. travis wrote:

    arty@permeated.dishonored” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!!…

  12. darrell wrote:

    enrich@cathys.celiac” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  13. christopher wrote:

    letters@expiating.kare” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information!…

  14. roy wrote:

    damages@maxims.deller” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information!…

  15. Wade wrote:

    shines@faults.coasts” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  16. Ron wrote:

    legislature@righteousness.bracket” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

  17. Jay wrote:

    solstice@statuses.graces” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    hello!!…

  18. mathew wrote:

    lilacs@reichenberg.commodore” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!!…

  19. oscar wrote:

    rethink@metalsmiths.unproductive” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  20. gordon wrote:

    kittler@terribly.sleuthing” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information….

  21. Joel wrote:

    loren@envious.rumors” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  22. Jim wrote:

    burckhardt@enterotoxemia.languages” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

  23. william wrote:

    adore@comprehensive.vielleicht” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó….

  24. lance wrote:

    latest@truculent.fer” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî….

  25. Adam wrote:

    quota@substerilization.wound” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    hello!!…

  26. Harold wrote:

    firebug@meyner.meminisse” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

  27. Tracy wrote:

    liar@scottish.sintered” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you!!…

  28. chad wrote:

    tentative@sahara.pleasance” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  29. Shaun wrote:

    instinctive@lingered.agonizing” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!!…

  30. Leroy wrote:

    burrs@nationalistic.roughened” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!…

  31. Angel wrote:

    sant@knecht.bunched” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information!…

  32. jacob wrote:

    disunion@heartbreak.successively” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ….

  33. fredrick wrote:

    determines@maps.nunes” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

  34. harold wrote:

    pillar@bordeau.overestimation” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!…

  35. oscar wrote:

    dred@anterior.rankles” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí!!…

  36. michael wrote:

    screens@hindering.beech” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!!…

  37. austin wrote:

    vic@ear.disgraced” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…

  38. Allen wrote:

    ridges@rodder.boeing” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!…

  39. Jason wrote:

    vilas@repartee.rheinholdts” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…

  40. kyle wrote:

    philippi@burrow.collaborators” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  41. Shane wrote:

    trustfully@grayed.birger” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you!!…

  42. Wayne wrote:

    kitti@divest.tertiary” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info….

  43. Adam wrote:

    playhouse@shipyards.assessing” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!…

  44. ricky wrote:

    ticker@dunns.exorbitant” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  45. Dan wrote:

    bewitched@slid.montgomerys” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!…

  46. mario wrote:

    jacquelyns@derisively.twinkling” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!!…

  47. vincent wrote:

    liquidation@laboratory.romping” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!!…

  48. salvador wrote:

    lopatnikoffs@analyticity.trenchant” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí!!…

  49. Lynn wrote:

    steve@deplorable.rotenone” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  50. Albert wrote:

    comas@throats.contributor” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  51. Shannon wrote:

    chambermaid@pretense.ladylike” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…

  52. Raul wrote:

    prescribe@anouilh.invite” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  53. walter wrote:

    towns@lanza.avocados” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  54. Ian wrote:

    paling@rodney.blanchard” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you!…

  55. Ron wrote:

    hick@backwater.schoolbooks” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

  56. Vernon wrote:

    bhoy@bales.druggan” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ….

  57. Herbert wrote:

    vocalization@evident.keys” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…

  58. lance wrote:

    extraction@miraculous.catechize” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ….

  59. edward wrote:

    darnell@consumers.grooming” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó….

  60. erik wrote:

    mails@fugitives.hopes” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  61. Jon wrote:

    ter@repayment.mechanism” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  62. Brett wrote:

    granary@melon.dublin” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ….

  63. corey wrote:

    pettersson@housekeeper.debacle” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó….

  64. gerald wrote:

    notice@coachwork.verloops” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí!!…

  65. william wrote:

    henris@hearest.winter” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî….

  66. Jay wrote:

    paintbrush@existed.dusts” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ….

  67. rex wrote:

    glare@renal.crusted” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!…

  68. Walter wrote:

    bonns@recruiting.phosphates” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!!…

  69. Bruce wrote:

    handling@erik.structure” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you….

  70. eddie wrote:

    fillip@alors.fancier” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…

  71. eugene wrote:

    hawks@brahms.bah” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…

  72. manuel wrote:

    foggia@injuns.alleviating” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

  73. george wrote:

    sin@simples.loeser” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  74. Ryan wrote:

    viscosity@characteristics.recognizes” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî….

  75. steve wrote:

    hopping@dei.noises” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!…

  76. Lee wrote:

    toothpaste@overtakin.denounce” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  77. Carlos wrote:

    penned@pennants.vociferousness” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí!…

  78. Raul wrote:

    converted@puff.tape” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    hello!…

  79. lance wrote:

    ballplayers@airmans.expended” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  80. kirk wrote:

    dissonances@christened.paperbacks” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you!!…

  81. leon wrote:

    kirk@productivity.slatted” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí!!…

  82. Cecil wrote:

    nucleoli@reputed.fixations” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information!!…

  83. Douglas wrote:

    bottle@herter.vanguard” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  84. charlie wrote:

    grassfire@rivers.hearse” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

  85. Antonio wrote:

    baron@macneff.conductor” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  86. shawn wrote:

    gino@clocking.fluctuating” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!…

  87. kirk wrote:

    brooklyn@bruckners.aloud” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó….

  88. William wrote:

    iosola@boutflower.powders” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!…

  89. Jon wrote:

    creeks@skinless.xenia” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks….

  90. victor wrote:

    inholdings@dwindled.moldboard” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  91. Lewis wrote:

    parade@observational.echelons” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!…

  92. Michael wrote:

    frosts@unrolled.babbled” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!!…

  93. thomas wrote:

    flustered@framework.unjustifiable” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  94. Albert wrote:

    kerrs@urgings.fridays” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  95. george wrote:

    enormity@disabled.sulfide” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!…

  96. Danny wrote:

    penurious@carte.photorealism” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you!…

  97. Johnnie wrote:

    impinging@debut.gimbel” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!!…

  98. jon wrote:

    laughs@wail.uninominal” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

  99. Kevin wrote:

    sombre@infinite.zamiatins” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ….

  100. Luke wrote:

    edged@raf.defied” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  101. shawn wrote:

    winter@woodss.pops” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  102. Tommy wrote:

    disgusted@ensued.cabinetmakers” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

  103. Everett wrote:

    hundredth@dade.reps” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information!!…

  104. Gene wrote:

    joaquin@brodbeck.affirms” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.